6-3-13: 9/9 [sub-leak?-WikiLeaks’
Paul Ryan exposure, (2/5) Case
Study, Ryan/Romney
run from Ryan plan.., Smirking
Gun[!], (5 /5)Obama
Leaks] Bottom-Line? [Really!{?} Future
Bubble?, Bricks
and stones, Unspinning
Charlotte! !]
6-5-13: 8/15 two versions, 10/15 not(a,b) 11/15 too (a - Irony
versus Hypocrisy, b(ii), c, d, Regime
Rhetoric Reply)
6-6-13: Recent
Ex-Changes of 7, 2 /7, Mitt's
BO*Son, Try
Angle, 5 of, The
Mis-Underestimator of, "people
like you"/7.
1 of 15, 2, 3 of15, 4of, 5, 6, 7, 8 of, 9 /, Contempt
for Courage, Better
Business Bureau, 12 of, What
the Beck? /, 14 of, 15-All in?
6-10-13 (b.s.) Under
the Table?, The
Maze of Mace( 2/7 ), Bring
It On!, Lib...Ya[!]
is not Free!( 4 ), Toning
Down the Lines.( 5 ), Progress
is Global( 6 ), Phase
II?
6-21-13 Not Here Yet!
6-24-13 NOW is to be inserted later. "first+casualty"(b. s.) / "on the table buffet" ( b. s. ) (sc)
6-25-13 Yes, mean time is one word[!] C-till or...(fn2)
6-26-13 Hecuva job and whose here to help you, re labels and spoiler alerts.
6-27-13 : Post Newtonian Economics ... hilite Knot [!]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query table buffet. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query table buffet. Sort by date Show all posts
Saturday, June 01, 2013
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
F'n P[!]
an-archy? / tan gent
[!] sarcasm irony punk.
Lede or Ship: Heading
4 M or links in order of insert
(In F able. / punc. / -archy / gent)
War'n Buffet Rule
The P ?
Original Intent: almost lost, Footnotes Page # ?
Gephardt* -House Republicans Changed the Rules to Keep Government Closed
McConnell -Who Controls the House GOP?
Battle. - George W. Bush and the Real Story of the Great Recession**** - (b.s.) Buffet + Warren
Re - Buffet +Metaphor
: - Rule + Field
congre$$ - [War'n Pic/MoveOn]
AM:
Pelosi/
Klobuchar
Gang **
** links/line anachronistic
AM=Andrea Mithell
*** Deep Files Go 4 it.
(buy Jim'n Knee: Faith 'n Progress ?)
[The Cycle? New Hostage on the Table. / Measured Optimism ? ]
[If you don't vote, you won't get your pudding. How can you get your pudding when you won't eat your meet?]
[!] sarcasm irony punk.
Lede or Ship: Heading
4 M or links in order of insert
(In F able. / punc. / -archy / gent)
War'n Buffet Rule
The P ?
Original Intent: almost lost, Footnotes Page # ?
Gephardt* -House Republicans Changed the Rules to Keep Government Closed
McConnell -Who Controls the House GOP?
Battle. - George W. Bush and the Real Story of the Great Recession**** - (b.s.) Buffet + Warren
Re - Buffet +Metaphor
: - Rule + Field
congre$$ - [War'n Pic/MoveOn]
AM:
Pelosi/
Klobuchar
Gang **
** links/line anachronistic
AM=Andrea Mithell
*** Deep Files Go 4 it.
(buy Jim'n Knee: Faith 'n Progress ?)
[The Cycle? New Hostage on the Table. / Measured Optimism ? ]
[If you don't vote, you won't get your pudding. How can you get your pudding when you won't eat your meet?]
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Two Wrongs Make a Right?
Romney would rather have the discussion be, him as a victim of class warf**are, than discussing the choice between his (Ryan/Bane or Priebus/Gitmo) economy and the Obama Economy.
(Trigger? Hardball!)
(Out-sourcing/Off shoring? That's the ticket or GitMo.)
(Kill*** the Strategy: More Politics ofor* the Table.)
* [!] not quite over(Water Sport anyone)
[7-11-12 All links added today.]
[Not sure about the Hardball. Is that the ticket?]
**A mitt-insert, structural typo, or metaphorical evolution of warf-are.
*** Skirting the poly ticks.(Holder v. Hold-up)
[Not that out-sourcing or off-shoring are wrong, but man up ...] *iv
P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)
(Trigger? Hardball!)
(Out-sourcing/Off shoring? That's the ticket or GitMo.)
(Kill*** the Strategy: More Politics ofor* the Table.)
* [!] not quite over(Water Sport anyone)
[7-11-12 All links added today.]
[Not sure about the Hardball. Is that the ticket?]
**A mitt-insert, structural typo, or metaphorical evolution of warf-are.
*** Skirting the poly ticks.(Holder v. Hold-up)
[Not that out-sourcing or off-shoring are wrong, but man up ...] *iv
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Brackets and the Debt Clock
[9-26-11 UPDATE: Tax Plan and "Fiscal Terrorism" A slight rearrangement and edit for clarity below. ]
[In might be easier if the links and asterisks are referenced later.***]
The whole issue of cuts over revenues * _ must be sorted out on two fronts. There is the issue of the so-called "progressive" tax code. Then there is the issue of the history of the tax code(see* pun), and how it impacts the debt clock.
The first regards the "Buffet Rule". There are the actual tax bracket rates(10% to 35%), and then there is the effective tax rate, which is further complicated(reduced) by captial gains tax rates(15%). Let us also be reminded that even the richest pay the same rates for their first brackets worth of income,(ZERO), let alone each bracket's worth of income. But since the capital gains tax is most of the income of the bulk of the rich, the effective tax rate will not be the actual sum of each bracket's worth. I will not bother to do some math here, but I hope it is clear. Basically the effective tax rate for the rich are not effective as "progressive" by a look at their brackets. They effectively get a lower tax rate, because capital gains are taxed less than the middle to top income brackets.
Second, there is the matter of the "Debt Clock", which should have its own brackets of sorts. The Bush wars, as well as his Medicare(fix), not to mention his tax cuts are off the clock so-to-speak. Not to mention the economic down turn which should probably reset the clock. If I was able to clarify the first issue, I don't mean to make up for it by complicating the second. But the "spending under borrowing" is more than a pun, it is an economic effect. For now I just mean to address the clock issue. Where I imagine that there could be some way to show previous administration's as well as the current administration's** debt clocks.
Now, I hope that I can get away with not providing more detail. But it is not so simple, as I almost closed the issue. It would not be simply an historical replay of their debt clocks, but a sorting of the debt from their budgets. So we would have several clocks at different brackets in time. This is the matter, where the devil is in the details. This almost becomes a matter for mathematical physicists in regard to the dynamics of budgets and time, in that each bracket in time has potential future impact where political economists would sit in for the mathematical physicists.
But, I hope that it can be imagined that each bracket in time, have two clocks. Their own budget and the debt that was not theirs. I will leave it for real economists or accountants to sort out whether there needs to be more than two, as I don't know if it is just my imagination, or the reality of the difficulty in sorting this out. In this regard, I mean the difficulty of sorting a budget's impact over time. But maybe it can be imagined from the effective impact that war and medicare can have on people and how dynamic that is over time, let alone the setting of tax rates. In fact, that is addressed by one or two instances alone. The Bush tax cuts were temporary. The Bush wars and the Medicare fix were not paid for.
[Please note that the links and image were inserted after completion of this blog post. They include, in order: The New York Times, FOX NEWS, No-Labels, and the Center for American Progress [9-26-11: OurFuture.org], where it was not my intent to lower the level of discourse nor bring more nuanced metaphor to light. But please note my No-Labels comment, in regard to the referees and what is on the table. Not to pun on a game buffet, but the neither the cuts sandwich nor the sand wedged in links were referenced for the writing of this post. But it may be suitable that brackets and clocks are used in games. This is a not so nuanced reference to the sports analogy of politics.]
*which alone needs some economic sorting: I mean "spending under borrowing", to pun a bit.
** oops, a whole new clock issue, why not bracket it by congresses?
*** not to mention by myself
[9-23-11 Update 'nuff s' Ed?] Iron Chef!
[9-29-11 update on timing, see comment 2. Speaking of timing,(darn) lost it for a moment.]
[In might be easier if the links and asterisks are referenced later.***]
The whole issue of cuts over revenues * _ must be sorted out on two fronts. There is the issue of the so-called "progressive" tax code. Then there is the issue of the history of the tax code(see* pun), and how it impacts the debt clock.
The first regards the "Buffet Rule". There are the actual tax bracket rates(10% to 35%), and then there is the effective tax rate, which is further complicated(reduced) by captial gains tax rates(15%). Let us also be reminded that even the richest pay the same rates for their first brackets worth of income,(ZERO), let alone each bracket's worth of income. But since the capital gains tax is most of the income of the bulk of the rich, the effective tax rate will not be the actual sum of each bracket's worth. I will not bother to do some math here, but I hope it is clear. Basically the effective tax rate for the rich are not effective as "progressive" by a look at their brackets. They effectively get a lower tax rate, because capital gains are taxed less than the middle to top income brackets.
Second, there is the matter of the "Debt Clock", which should have its own brackets of sorts. The Bush wars, as well as his Medicare(fix), not to mention his tax cuts are off the clock so-to-speak. Not to mention the economic down turn which should probably reset the clock. If I was able to clarify the first issue, I don't mean to make up for it by complicating the second. But the "spending under borrowing" is more than a pun, it is an economic effect. For now I just mean to address the clock issue. Where I imagine that there could be some way to show previous administration's as well as the current administration's** debt clocks.
Now, I hope that I can get away with not providing more detail. But it is not so simple, as I almost closed the issue. It would not be simply an historical replay of their debt clocks, but a sorting of the debt from their budgets. So we would have several clocks at different brackets in time. This is the matter, where the devil is in the details. This almost becomes a matter for mathematical physicists in regard to the dynamics of budgets and time, in that each bracket in time has potential future impact where political economists would sit in for the mathematical physicists.
But, I hope that it can be imagined that each bracket in time, have two clocks. Their own budget and the debt that was not theirs. I will leave it for real economists or accountants to sort out whether there needs to be more than two, as I don't know if it is just my imagination, or the reality of the difficulty in sorting this out. In this regard, I mean the difficulty of sorting a budget's impact over time. But maybe it can be imagined from the effective impact that war and medicare can have on people and how dynamic that is over time, let alone the setting of tax rates. In fact, that is addressed by one or two instances alone. The Bush tax cuts were temporary. The Bush wars and the Medicare fix were not paid for.
[Please note that the links and image were inserted after completion of this blog post. They include, in order: The New York Times, FOX NEWS, No-Labels, and the Center for American Progress [9-26-11: OurFuture.org], where it was not my intent to lower the level of discourse nor bring more nuanced metaphor to light. But please note my No-Labels comment, in regard to the referees and what is on the table. Not to pun on a game buffet, but the neither the cuts sandwich nor the sand wedged in links were referenced for the writing of this post. But it may be suitable that brackets and clocks are used in games. This is a not so nuanced reference to the sports analogy of politics.]
*which alone needs some economic sorting: I mean "spending under borrowing", to pun a bit.
** oops, a whole new clock issue, why not bracket it by congresses?
*** not to mention by myself
[9-23-11 Update 'nuff s' Ed?] Iron Chef!
[9-29-11 update on timing, see comment 2. Speaking of timing,(darn) lost it for a moment.]
Thursday, July 12, 2012
The Vice President Rolls
Currently speaking before*** the NAACP, Vice President Biden drives** President Obama's record against the wall that is* the Republican party and their candidate.
(Brakin' news on Bane or change "existentialist" opposition research Raw Money the con spiracy candid ate. See aster risks[!]) It may be more than interesting how things Pan out [!]
*** (anachronism)"ain't your father's" mess age in? ( i.e. links to be added )
**"eviscerate" was originally one of the choices in my lede
*awkard metaphor
[Note that asterisk were placed progressively: *,**,***]
[Links inserted *** in reverse, after the link it applies to "before". The broke-in pun of existential ism is "interesting" "pa"n "out" [!] Ctrl F Spells = prophetic.]
[Ouch what a fet we weave.]
SEG WAY: GPS of sorts?
I have updated several PAGES today. Re- sorts of sort.
The plan is to review the meta4s. (Buffet/Table Structure/Drive)
Or restructure the "L"aments of existentialism.
Earth, Wind, Fire, Water. Con Science?
(7-13-12: links 2&3& YouTube and Speech label added)
(Brakin' news on Bane or change "existentialist" opposition research Raw Money the con spiracy candid ate. See aster risks[!]) It may be more than interesting how things Pan out [!]
*** (anachronism)"ain't your father's" mess age in? ( i.e. links to be added )
**"eviscerate" was originally one of the choices in my lede
*awkard metaphor
[Note that asterisk were placed progressively: *,**,***]
[Links inserted *** in reverse, after the link it applies to "before". The broke-in pun of existential ism is "interesting" "pa"n "out" [!] Ctrl F Spells = prophetic.]
[Ouch what a fet we weave.]
SEG WAY: GPS of sorts?
I have updated several PAGES today. Re- sorts of sort.
The plan is to review the meta4s. (Buffet/Table Structure/Drive)
Or restructure the "L"aments of existentialism.
Earth, Wind, Fire, Water. Con Science?
(7-13-12: links 2&3& YouTube and Speech label added)
Thursday, May 01, 2014
FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE- MAY 2014
5-4-14 In
Spiration: Salon-W.R. Klemm / Sch~hhh[!] ... Who started it, I finished it, it still needs sense. (Ctrl F: sense ) Everything Model? A. Para-model, B. Almost
makes me want to tweet. , C. Wittgenstein, D. The
Politics of the Table. , E. What
the Beck? (Witt Gen Stein's Buffet) Milo Wolfowitz (FP2)
5-5-14: fath: ...: gr : your : [nexus, cats, herstory, herding] 1.A. NEXUS REVIEW (Re-posted) , B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I. 2. A., B. C. D. Reigning wags and tales ... M. 3. EH? The History of B.S. 4[$]. A. B., C.Congress is Like Herding Death Panels!, D. What's good for the goose... [?] ow!
5-7-14: SkyNet published from 5-6-14. Yes link inserted, but italics added.
5-29-14 this: Nixon- Plausible Deniability / Bush 43- Plausible Incompetence / Snowden- Plausible What? Hence the word. Posting based solely on NBC link. 4Later digging/yet/to read. ...& further D'Ribble rather than G'Ribble; Plausible Disciplination asks about his education and training in law or civics or what else he was educated in that might inform his understanding of this exchange with authorities, not that we should expect constitutional scholars not to have varied opinions. Italics: not a foundation for my ainfount[><]. i.e. bu'dump ump[~]
5-5-14: fath: ...: gr : your : [nexus, cats, herstory, herding] 1.A. NEXUS REVIEW (Re-posted) , B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I. 2. A., B. C. D. Reigning wags and tales ... M. 3. EH? The History of B.S. 4[$]. A. B., C.Congress is Like Herding Death Panels!, D. What's good for the goose... [?] ow!
5-7-14: SkyNet published from 5-6-14. Yes link inserted, but italics added.
5-29-14 this: Nixon- Plausible Deniability / Bush 43- Plausible Incompetence / Snowden- Plausible What? Hence the word. Posting based solely on NBC link. 4Later digging/yet/to read. ...& further D'Ribble rather than G'Ribble; Plausible Disciplination asks about his education and training in law or civics or what else he was educated in that might inform his understanding of this exchange with authorities, not that we should expect constitutional scholars not to have varied opinions. Italics: not a foundation for my ainfount[><]. i.e. bu'dump ump[~]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)